beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.04.18 2014고정175

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are engaging in the retail business of high-railroad E, a corporation in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the victim F(58) is the head of the management office of the G Complex where E belongs.

On October 21, 2013, from around 10:30 to around 10:45, the Defendants: (a) left the G Complex office located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) left the city for the reason that the victim was unable to use the access road to the said Corporation; and (c) refused proposals by the victim as the head of Geumsan-gun Office; (d) Defendant A led the victim to take the breath of the breath, leading the victim into the breath, leading the victim’s left side by hand; (e) Defendant B took the back of the victim’s back at a canter on two occasions; and (e) Defendant B continued to take the back of the victim’s back to the back seat of the said G Complex; and (e) Defendant B forced the victim to take the back seat of the said Corporation; and (e) Defendant B did not move the victim’s back to the front breath of the said vehicle with the victim’s left part, and died of the victim’s gold burg, etc., with the victim’s gold 4 p.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 2 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act as to the facts of the crime concerned, Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint confinement), Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the provisional payment orders does not want the punishment of the Defendants