beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.11.14 2015고단3803

사기

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 7, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Daejeon District Court on July 3, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 3, 2014, and on May 27, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years of imprisonment for the same crime at the same court on May 27, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 4, 2015.

“2015 Goman 3803: Defendant A is the representative director of (ju) E established for the purpose of removal and punishment, etc., and Defendant B is the person who was rare to the said association.

When the Defendants were selected as an administrative-oriented complex city and started the development work, they knew that the Cheongpy City Construction Cheongdo in charge of the said construction and the HaH construction support for the residents of Sejong City in the above construction, and would give the above residents a contract for the wooden construction.

The money was received in return for that money.

A. On February 2010, the Defendants received from the “E” office located in the “E” office located in the “E” office in the Seocho-si, the Defendant deposited KRW 60 million with the performance deposit of the te that would reduce the construction work. The deposit will be repaid in full after the completion of the construction work, and if the construction is delayed or any problem arises, the deposit will be refunded immediately.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, the above facts merely thought that the defendants used the above money for personal purposes in their own shares, and there was no intention or ability to have the victim perform the above work because there was no contract for the above timber construction work at the time.

As above, the Defendants deceptioned the victim, entered into a contract for construction work with the victim, and received KRW 30 million from the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of I on February 12, 2010.

B. On April 10, 2010, the Defendants: (a) around Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu; and (b) Defendant B, the victim, “In addition to the previously contracted construction, there was a set of timber construction works in an additional 30,000 square meters; and (c) KRW 20,000,000.