beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.05.09 2017고단1065

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the former representative director of the limited company D in Jung-Eup, and the victim E (54) was an employee employed by F, the present representative director of the above company, and the defendant was in conflict with the victim employed by the present representative director while disputing the management right of the above company.

On November 3, 2016, the Defendant, at around 19:30 on November 3, 2016, had not opened the office door in the above company office, opened a lock-up device of the office entrance due to blue blue blue blue flue, and boomed the flue of the victim’s boom. The victim boomed the victim’s brue to brue and boomed the victim’s brue, resulting in the victim’s brue and brue, resulting in the victim’s brue, resulting in the victim’s brue and brue

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the witness G in the third public trial records;

1. Statement made by the witness H in the fifth public trial records;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the CD screen of the D case (the defendant and his defense counsel only met with the victim's head that they fell under the minor part of the victim's body. Thus, the victim's injury to the victim's left-hand glass blood, etc. and the defendant's act do not have a causal relation.

In light of the following circumstances, the above assertion is without merit, given that each of the above evidence was added to the results of the factual inquiry reply to the Director of the I Hospital of this Court.

① On the CCTV images taken at the time of the instant case, the Defendant destroyed the door of a locked office, led the victim out of the office, and was dispatched out of the office, and was separated from the victim’s bank. However, on the other hand, the victim was placed in front of the head of the Defendant’s head, and on the other hand, the victim was able to take up the front part of the victim’s head, and on the other hand, the victim was able to keep the victim out of the center.