출석정지 및 특별교육이수 처분 취소
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff A is a disabled person of the first grade intellectual disability who is in the third grade of C elementary school, and D (hereinafter "victim student") is a disabled person of the third grade of intellectual disability, who is in the first grade of the same school.
Plaintiff
B is the mother of the plaintiff A.
B. On June 13, 2017, Plaintiff A and the victim were assisted by public interest service personnel when moving within the ordinary school. On June 12:35, 2017, Plaintiff A took the knife of the victim student and the public interest personnel and carried the knife of the knife of the knife in the knife of the knife of the knife and the knife of the knife in the knife of the knife, the knife knife knife knife knif
(hereinafter “school violence in this case”). C.
C Elementary School Violence Autonomy Committee(hereinafter referred to as the "Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence").
On June 27, 2017, a meeting is held on June 27, 2017, and "Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence" (hereinafter referred to as "Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence") is called
Pursuant to paragraphs 1, 3, and 9 of Article 17, measures of 10 hours of special education and 15 days of suspension of attendance were decided against A, and measures of 5 hours of special education are decided against B.
Accordingly, on June 28, 2017, the defendant issued a disposition of 10 hours of special education and 15 days of suspension of attendance to the plaintiff A, and 5 hours of special education to the plaintiff B.
hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"
【Ground of recognition】An absence of any dispute, Gap’s 1 through 3, and Eul’s 1 through 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)
each entry and the purport of the whole pleading
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the plaintiff A had no seriousness, sustainability, and intention of the school violence of this case as a disabled person of grade 1 with intellectual disability. The plaintiff A is in profoundly against the plaintiff A, and the plaintiffs have endeavored to compromise with victim students, and the parents of victim students do not punish the plaintiff A.