However, there has been a history of criminal punishment several times for the crime of larceny, and in particular, some of the crimes of this case are deemed to have been committed during the period of repeated crime; the nature of the crime is not good; the act of denying the identity card of her birth is used for the crime of larceny; the thief is large amount of 52 million won; the amount of theft damage is large; the number of illegal uttering of official document and the crime of unauthorized Driving is large; some victims submitted a written agreement under the name of some victims; but the actual damage recovery has not been actually performed; most victims are punished; the punishment of the defendant is the age, character, career, career, environment, the background and consequence of the crime of this case; and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered, it is not unreasonable for the court below to have imposed imprisonment (three years) too much.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.