beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.05.29 2017고정796

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

(a) A person shall not distribute or use, or display or store, a game product with a content different from the rated one;

Nevertheless, from March 13, 2017 to April 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from the “GPC room” operated by the Defendant (F, 102, and 105), the Defendant stored in the ice-type game machine 50 units, which are free mobile games, differently from the content of the rating classification; (b) stored in the ice-type game machine 50 units; and (c) provided customers with a game by means of network connections.

B. From March 2017 to April 17, 2017, Defendant B, who was employed by Defendant B, as a condition of receiving KRW 70,000 per day from the said “GPC room”, provided that he respondeds to customers and set up points acquired by customers using games.

As a result, the defendant made it easy for the defendant to commit acts that obstruct A's distribution order of game products.

(c)

Defendant

C From March 2017, from March 17, 2017 to April 17, 2017, the Defendant was employed by the “GPC room” as a condition to receive KRW 60,000 per day from the above A, and provided visitors with the points acquired by games.

As a result, the defendant made it easy for the defendant to commit acts that obstruct A's distribution order of game products.

2. Determination

A. According to the facts charged in which public prosecution water was actually modified and the records of the instant case, the respective parts of the “games classified as game products” and “games offered for use by Defendant A” may be classified as follows:

① The former is a mobile game, and the latter can be used in a AD-type game machine. ② Unlike the former, the latter is unable to manipulate the game by using the screen called “INSERBL” and “IL” without putting waste every hour.