B. The Defendant asked the victim F, who is a police official belonging to the Ulsannam Police Station E zone in the Ulsannam Police Station E zone, who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports from the place of business of the above singing room in the second floor in the singing room, employee D, etc., in the second floor, to ask the Defendant “Isk, Isk,” and “Isk, Isn., Isk..., Isn..,” and the Defendant asked the Defendant “Isk, Isk, Isk, kn., Isn., Isk?, Isn., Isn., Isn., Isn., Isn., Isn., Isn., Isn., “Isk?, Isn., Isk?, Isn.

2. The facts charged above shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 311 of the same Act.

However, around August 28, 2013, the victim raised a letter of withdrawal of complaint, which was subsequent to the prosecution of this case, which was not punishable by the defendant.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.