When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) within a 750-year-Si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, the defect that the police officers, including B patrolmen C, who called out to the relevant area, recommended the Defendant to return home to the Defendant; and (b) attempted to cause the Defendant to go home to the police officers, including the police officers, belonging to B patrolmen, etc., who were called out to the relevant area upon the report by the head of the Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si

“Absing the bath of “,” etc., the said patrolman C did not have a title once as his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of reported cases and the maintenance of public security at public places.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act – Reasons for sentencing in favor of the defendant under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime and there is no record of imprisonment or heavier punishment than the suspension of execution; unfavorable circumstances: The fact that the police officer assaults the police officer to take a bath even after he/she was arrested, and the circumstance after the crime