A Imprisonment for three years, Defendant B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment for two years, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Quasi-rape;

A. The Defendant, at around 01:00 on October 24, 2016, had sexual intercourse with the victim by inserting his or her sexual organ on the part of the victim’s drinking room “Hel” located in Ansan G, with B, C, and I (inn, 19 years of age) while drinking alcohol together with B, C, and I (inn, she was used on the floor in a state of drinking by the victim, the victim was able to have her consciousnessd, and her sexual organ was added to the part of the victim’s sexual organ, and continuously she had sexual intercourse with the victim by inserting his or her sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sexual organ.

Accordingly, the Defendant raped the victim by taking advantage of the fact that the victim was unable to resist under the influence of alcohol.

B. The Defendants: (a) aided and abetting Defendants B and C to quasi-rape was drinking alcohol at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph A. at the same time and place as indicated in the same paragraph.

A made it easy for A to commit the crime of quasi-rape by making it possible for A to rape using the fact that the said victim was under the influence of alcohol, by making it possible for A to rape the victim by making a reply to “I to be able to know what I would be and once,” and by making her bed, by making it possible for A to rape the victim, and by making A smooth to commit the crime of quasi-rape by photographing the victim’s sexual intercourse at the next time, going to a mobile phone, going to a mobile phone, and taking the face of sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the Defendants aided A's quasi-rape.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes by the Defendants (Kamera and photographs)

A. The Defendants jointly committed the crime committed by the Defendants, at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) above, exceeded the clothes of the victim as described in paragraph (1) A, and committed a sexual intercourse with the victim as described in paragraph (1) 1-A, Defendant B and C were scambling from the side, and the face of the sexual intercourse between A and the victim was taken in video.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to take images that could cause a sense of sexual humiliation against the victim’s will.

B. Defendant B