[criminal power] On July 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.), and three years of suspended execution on August 1, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 1, 2013, and the Defendant has served twelve times of assault including the said force.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 20:20 on October 31, 2013, 2013, sent to the victim C (the age of 63) returned home from the corridor adjacent to the public toilets located adjacent to the Jandong-gun, Jandong-gun, Jandong-gun, without any justifiable reason; (b) while stating that “this shall be frighten; (c) the victim’s shoulder part is frighten by hand; and (d) the victim’s face part is frightened up to the floor; and (e) when the victim’s face part is about 7 times by drinking, she was frighted with a light stay requiring treatment for about 14 days.

2. On January 20, 2014, at around 19:45, the Defendant requested the victim G (the 39-year old-old) (the 39-year-old) who was in the vicinity of the E-si office located in E-si, Hanam-gun, to provide alcohol to the victim G (the 39-year-old-old). However, the Defendant did not provide alcohol to the victim, and instead, deemed himself/herself as a private taxi office, and instead, she took away to the above private taxi office, and she took three times into his/her hands, followed the rest of the victim, and she took three times into his/her hand, and she took the main electronic body containing heavy water on his/her her her depositor, and she saws the victim’s head into the left part of the victim’s body, and made it effective when the victim entered the victim’s cell phone and did not enter all the victim’s water.

3. On January 20, 2014, at around 19:55, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the victim’s right eye at one time at the hand floor, and destroyed the police officer’s 150,000 won at the market price on which the victim was worn, on the ground that the victim I (the age of 58) committed an act, as the victim I (the age of 58) was able to wait at the scene after having received a call report of 112 at the same place; and (b) he prevented the Defendant from taking a bath to the said G; and (c) the police officer’s act.