When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. At around 05:40 on July 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties on the street in front of the Jeju-gu Police Station Down-gu, Jeju-si, Jeju-si; (b) obstructed the Defendant, upon receiving a report from G in the circumstances in which the said earth was located, on the day he was frighted to the day he was fright away from the taxi without having arrived at the destination from the E-Operation FF taxi on his boarding; and (c) obstructed the Defendant, upon receiving a report on the damage from the day he was frighting to drinking to E; and (d) assaulted by G, such as taking a fright back to the left hand of G, without getting out of the taxi, without getting out of the taxi.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the reporting of crimes and the handling of principal offenders.

2. The Defendant damaged property at the same date and time as indicated in the preceding paragraph, and at the same place as indicated in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was requested by the police officer to leave the taxi, and the Defendant destroyed the above FF taxi, which is owned by the Defendant’s sexual traffic, by shouldering the back door of the lower end of the FF taxi owned by the Defendant, thereby damaging the repair cost in an amount equivalent to KRW 213,950 in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. E statements;

1. Written estimate of the damaged vehicle;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each of the selective fines for punishment (including the reflection of the punishment, the agreement with the victim of the crime of property damage, the contingent crime, and the fact that the crime has been committed for about twenty years since the mistake in 198, and the fact that the person has been living without committing a crime for about twenty years after the mistake in 198;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;