특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 8, 2010, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) is a person who received a summary order of a fine of three million won or more due to a violation of Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) from the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court on November 8, 201, and the Daejeon District Court on November 21, 2013, issued a summary order of a fine of three hundred and five hundred and fifty thousand won due to a violation of Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and has the record of being punished for drinking driving two or more times, respectively.
On October 29, 2016, around 15:10 on October 29, 2016, the Defendant driven a body car with C in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.358% from the 1km section of 1km to the Hong-gun Hong-gun Hong-gun Hong-gun Hong-gun, Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hong-gun, the Defendant driven a body car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.358% in blood.
2. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving bodily vehicles C in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving).
On October 29, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, such as the foregoing No. 1, around 15:10 on October 29, 2016, and led to a two-lane road of 172-1, e.g., Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, under the influence of alcohol, along one-lane from the shooting distance of FH apartment to the shooting distance of FH apartment.
At that time, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating steering steering the steering gear and steering the steering gear, etc. in the case of a driver of a motor vehicle, as the victim D(52) and E-V driven by the driver of a motor vehicle. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to drive normally under the influence of alcohol and continued to do so, as seen above, by negligence, the defendant's vehicle behind the cargo of the above victim and collision with the part of the defendant's vehicle in front of the car.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above occupational negligence requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc.