성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months, additional collection, Defendant C: imprisonment for 8 months, confiscation and additional collection) of the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. The crime of arranging sexual traffic is a criminal with great social harm, such as the commercialization of sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals. In light of the period, profits, and scale of the defendants' operation of the instant sexual traffic business establishment, there was a record of being sentenced to a fine for the crime of violating the Employment Security Act due to the business of an unauthorized paid job placement agency in around 2016. Defendant C has a record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Prevention of Prostitution, etc. around 199, and Defendant C has a record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on the Prevention of Prostitution, etc., and there was a number of years of punishment as shown in the arguments and the records of the instant case, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the court below's punishment seems to have been appropriately determined by taking into account the circumstances, including various sentencing grounds asserted by the defendants, and there is no special circumstance
3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.