하자보수보증금 등 청구의 소
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to Defendant SP Construction Co., Ltd, KRW 371,718,292 and KRW 201,00,000 among them, respectively. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27905, Feb. 2, 2017>
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The plaintiff is an autonomous management organization composed of representatives from each Dong residents of the 401 unit of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government A Apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"). B district Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter "the Housing Association of this case") is the implementer who constructed and sold the apartment of this case, Defendant GaS Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Defendant GaS Construction") established a contract of this case with the association of this case, and Defendant GaS Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Defendant GaS Construction") guaranteed the obligation to repair defects in the apartment of this case.
B. On January 16, 2012, Defendant 1 entered into a contract for the repair of defects with the Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance and the instant apartment on January 16, 2012 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) 281,560,275 203,90,6883, 2013, 2014, 203, 205, 203, 203, 14, 201, 205, 203, 203, 203, 205, 204, 205, 204, 31, 205, 203, 205, 204, 205, 204, 201, 31, 2015, 31, 204, 203, 205, 14, 2015.
(2) Since the Plaintiff, an autonomous organization of the instant apartment, the guarantee creditor of the instant guarantee agreement, was changed to the Plaintiff, as the instant apartment was organized on January 31, 2012.
C. On the apartment of this case, the defect occurrence and the defect repair cost of the apartment of this case, the part to be constructed according to the design drawing is not constructed, or the defect such as rupture, water leakage, etc. is defective in the section for common use and the section for exclusive use by constructing it differently from the