beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.08.21 2017고단866

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On May 30, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Daejeon District Court's support for the Daejeon District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Daejeon Prison on December 17, 2008.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 866

1. On February 10, 2017, the criminal defendant against the victim C told the victim C to the effect that “The husband died in a traffic accident that he/she was in office in Ulsan Hyundai Motor, but he/she was in charge of the fact that he/she was in charge of the fact, so he/she could allow the children to find employment in Ulsan Hyundai Motor.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, the defendant did not have a will or ability to find the injured party's children employed in the Ulsan Modern Motor.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 50,000 won from the victim to the credit account (F) in the name of the branch on the 14th day of the same month from the victim, from that time, and obtained 22,20,000 won in total from that time to March 18, 2017, including the transfer of 50,000 won from March 18, 2017.

2. On January 31, 2017, at the victim G’s place under the above paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant told the victim G to the effect that “The Defendant invested the Ulsan land in the business of acquiring the housing unsold in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H apartment unsold in lots, which is planned by the injured party, in the amount of KRW 7 billion in the sales price, and not yet in the balance, to lend money.”

However, the defendant did not have real estate in the name of the defendant, and there was no intention or ability to invest funds in the victim, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed funds.

As such, the Defendant, as from March 17, 201, received a total of KRW 6,50,000,000 from the time when he/she was accused of the victim and was transferred to the credit union account (F) in the name of the same day from the victim, and received KRW 2,00,000,000 from March 17, 2017.