Defendant,

1. At around 23:00 on December 7, 201, 201, Esing stores operated by the victim D, who is the victim D, who was in Chang Sea-gu, Changwon-si, and the fact was conducted as if he would make payment of the drinking value in collusion with F despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, and ordered the victim to provide alcohol, alcohol, etc., and it was received from the victim of this case an amount equivalent to eight million won at the market price;

2. On February 6, 2012: (a) around 02:20, at the “IO store” managed by the victim H of the damage in Seocho-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, where the victim H was provided with alcohol and alcohol, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the purchase price, the victim’s order for alcohol and alcohol that appears to be paid the purchase price; (b) the victim received alcohol and alcohol equivalent to 3.60,000 won in total; and (c) the market price did not pay service charges, etc. equivalent to 1.30,000 won in the market price, thereby obtaining economic benefits equivalent to

3. Around 03:00 on March 17, 2012, at the “Korea Labor Relations Commission,” operated by the victim J, who was in Chang-si G, Chang-si, Chang-si, and Chang-si, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the amount of the said amount by not paying service charges, etc. equivalent to 180,000 won, on the ground that, even if the victim J was provided with alcoholic beverages, he/she would have been aware of the fact despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price, and that he/she would be paid the price in spite of the absence of the intent or ability to do so.

4. At around 00:10 on March 31, 2012, the facts in the Nnobya room managed by the victim M in Jinagu L in Chang-si, Changwon-si, were received, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she was provided with alcoholic beverages and he/she was ordered to pay the price in spite of the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price, and it was ordered to pay the price in an amount equivalent to 5.20,000 won of the market price, and it was received from the victim, and the victim did not pay the service fee, etc. equivalent to 2.1

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;