However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On November 13, 2016, around 19:25, the Defendant: (a) while being drunk in front of the D District in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant’s horses, “I am Dozer Hospital” were assaulted at one time on the left face part of the said E due to the Defendant’s drinking of “I am Dozer Hospital.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photograph (Evidence 6);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution are as follows: (a) the scope of the recommendation, sentence, [the scope of the punishment [the scope of the punishment [the scope of the punishment that obstructs the performance of official duties (the interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of duties] and the basic area ( June 1 to April) of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.; (b) the crime of injury, etc.; (c) the facts of the crime are recognized and reflected; (d) the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the order.