Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. On August 20, 2014, on the ground that the Defendant parked in front of the Defendant’s house in the front of the Plaintiff’s house, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property by putting the victim’s property in front of the Plaintiff’s house, which was parked in that place, even if the lower part of the left part of the Eststya car quantity and the left part of the left part of the Estya car in front of the Plaintiff’s house.

2. The Defendant destroyed the victim’s property by walking the left-hand even back part of the GMW car owned by the victim F, which was parked in the above time and at the above place on the ground as above, and thereby causing damage to the victim’s property in an amount equivalent to 1070,000 won at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing site damage photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (a person with a mental disability due to the certificate of marction);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 32(1) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings for Dismissal of Application for Compensation (Formation of an Agreement between the Defendant and the applicant for compensation) [Distinct circumstances] The same crime committed in a state of mental disorder, the non-conformity of punishment, and the recovery of damage [Incompetuous circumstances]