However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From September 8, 2012 to November 1, 2012, the Defendant provided assistance in the violation of the Special Act on Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. to “C Game Chapter” located on the 2nd floor of Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, and D, E, etc., the place owner of the game, “the 60 unit of the original game G” shall be installed by altering the game machine to “the 10,000 unit of the game machine,” and the game score 10,000 won shall be accumulated if the customers input 10,000 won in the face-to-face, and the game score 5,000 won per 5,000 unit of the game, deducted from the game score 5,50 won per cash and 500 won per day, while aiding and abetting the game business by taking charge of D, such as cleaning, cleaning, etc.

2. On September 11, 2012, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. at the same place as around 21:20, around September 21, 2012, and thus, was in mind to undergo an investigation under the name of “F” by acquiring an identification card with a chance to obtain it before, and by stealing the name and resident registration number of “F”.

A. The Defendant, on September 12, 2012, under the interrogation protocol, was examined by slope G at the National Police Agency in Chungcheongnam-nam Regional Police Agency and the metropolitan investigation unit around 03:07, when he was examined by the Defendant on September 12, 2012, the Defendant informed the said slope G of the name and resident registration number of “F” and was examined under the name of “F” as if he was “F,” and without authority, entered the “F” in the “person who made a statement at the end of the above interrogation protocol as “F” and forged the signature of “F” by stating the “F” in the “person who made a statement at the end of the above interrogation protocol,” and, as such, the signature of “F” was duly signed as “F” by submitting the above interrogation protocol to G and signing the “F” as if he was aware of the forgery.