도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On September 25, 1997, B, the user of the Defendant, driven a C Twitter on around 17:38 on September 25, 1997, in violation of the restriction on vehicle operation by loading and operating a total weight exceeding 43.7 tons in excess of 1.1 tons on the second axis, 11.6 tons on the third axis, and gross weight exceeding 43.7 tons on the national highway in front of the regional highway inspection station located in South-gu at port.
2. The Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga decided October 28, 2010 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Consolidation) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995 and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) stated in Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article.
Article 47(2) proviso of the Constitutional Court Act provides that “The provision applicable to the above facts charged shall retroactively lose its effect in accordance with the decision of unconstitutionality.”
3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a crime, and thus, acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.