However, the lower court’s sentencing is not recognized to be unfair in light of various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the fact that the Defendant escaped because the Defendant was likely to be aware of drinking driving, and the nature of the crime is not good and the cost of repairing the damaged vehicle is considerable. However, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant was the primary offender; and (b) the victim does not want punishment by mutual consent with the victim.

Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.