2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that the Defendant does not seem to have committed the instant crime under a conclusive recognition of the substance and appearance of the Bophishing crime, and that the Defendant has no record of being punished in Korea.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant, taking part in the delivery of the amount of damage from the defendant's accomplice and delivered the amount of damage from the crime to another accomplice who instructed the above accomplice, and the nature of the crime is very poor. The crime of this case is very heavy, such as the amount of damage from the crime of this case to about 170 million won. The crime of this case is committed closely and systematically, so it is difficult to regulate the scope of damage, and it is not easy to recover damage, and its social harm is very great. Thus, the defendant's participation in the crime of this case needs to be strictly punished. The defendant was arrested to leave Korea to receive 30,000 won as agreed in return for the crime of this case, and the defendant tried to make a false statement at the time of investigation or to conceal the crime of this case by viewing that the defendant's criminal act of this case was committed by the victim of this case, and there is no reason to see that the defendant's motive and condition of the crime of this case's criminal act of this case, and it did not have been committed.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit.