On February 14, 2012, the Defendants decided to withdraw the above disciplinary action, withdraw the personnel of the head of the news report, and promote a strike for the purpose of the retirement of the president of the EI, on the grounds that it is unreasonable for the E management to take a disposition of suspension from office and reduction of salary for 13 persons in relation to the E Headquarters labor union strike in around July 2010, and from February 17, 2012, the Defendants decided to promote a strike for the purpose of the withdrawal of the above disciplinary action, withdrawal of personnel of the head of the news report, and withdrawal of the president of the EI. < Amended by Act No. 11317, Feb. 17, 2012>

2. From the vote for and against union members up to 23. 24, 964 of the number of members 1,064 who participated in the vote and 857 of them agree to the strike, a resolution was made to enter the strike from March 6, 2012, which was 120,000 won after the completion of the affirmative vote, so that any preparation for the strike may not be made in fact by a broadcasting company.

However, the strike is an illegal industrial action that has not been justified for the purpose of improving the working conditions of workers, and has not gone through the procedure of the competent Labor Relations Commission, as it aims to withdraw the disciplinary action against members of the E Headquarters Labor Relations Commission, withdraw the person from the head of the news report headquarters, and obtain the I retirement from the president.

Nevertheless, at around 14:00 to 15:40 on March 6, 2012, the Defendants were running a strike in such a way as to collectively refuse to provide labor as indicated in the “criminal sight table 1” from March 6, 2012 to June 8, 2012, by occupying the main facilities of E, including E, such as E, F,rogate, main K, etc., and by creating relief and holding a long-term meeting.