The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the occupational embezzlement of S public parking lot revenue (excluding the part on which the court below acquitted the Defendant on the ground of its reasoning) among the facts charged in the instant case, and did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the intent of unlawful acquisition of specific facts charged and occupational

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.