2. According to the judgment, the defendant can have been punished for the same traffic crime including the punishment, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case without heavy weight even though he was sentenced to two times or more of the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act during the period of repeated crime due to the same traffic crime, etc., although he was sentenced to a fine, he again committed the crime of this case without heavy weight. The crime of this case is deemed to have caused an accident while driving without a license under the influence of 0.139% of the blood alcohol concentration and caused an injury to the victims in light of the contents of the crime, and it is not bad in light of the nature of the crime and criminal situation, even though it did not reach an agreement with the victims, it is recognized that the sentence of the court below is appropriate in consideration of various kinds of sentencing conditions shown in arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime. Thus,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.