When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 23, 2019, the Defendant said that he would take a taxi from the taxi station in the permanent passenger service at around 1:00 to E in the permanent passenger service place and would pay the taxi cost if he would take a taxi from the taxi station in the permanent passenger service area to E in the permanent passenger service area D.

However, the defendant did not have any money at the time, so even if he uses a taxi, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, made the victim make a false statement to operate a taxi from the victim to E while permanently residing in D, and did not pay 3,300 won for taxi charges, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;