When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The driver of any motor vehicle who intends to enter the intersection where traffic is not controlled shall yield the course to the motor vehicle on the right side.

On November 2, 2013, the Defendant is a person driving C lele-do car, and the Defendant, at around 09:30 on November 2, 2013, has to yield the right of way to the right side of the road at a private-distance intersection where the traffic is not controlled in front of the second Sod-gu, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Yang Changwon-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Statement of the police statement of the defendant;

1. Response to the request for appraisal;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 26 (3) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion regarding the defendant's claim under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional stop at the intersection, stating that the defendant's vehicle was driven at the speed of about 30 meters on the right side after the temporary stop at the intersection, and that he first entered the intersection at a speed of less than 5 km. However, according to the defendant's response to the request for appraisal by the National Science Investigation Agency, unlike the defendant's temporary stop, the defendant's vehicle's vehicle from the time prior to the passage of the stop line to the time after the stop line passed through the stop line. The witness D who was driven at the right side of the defendant's right side was driving at a speed of about 30 km per hour, and passed the stop line at the intersection, and the defendant also stated that the driver's vehicle above passed after the stop line at the speed of 4 days after the traffic accident, at the time of the police on November 6, 2013, the defendant's argument that his vehicle's speed at the time of the accident was about 30 km.