A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for three months.

However, for two years from the date of this decision.

1. At around 15:50 on August 6, 2014, Defendant A expressed the Defendant’s desire to park double parking before the “FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE 121 on the ground that the Defendant her hand took the Defendant’s hand, and her face was at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and her face was at the time and place of drinking, and her face was at the time of taking several times, and the “seven weeks” specified in the written indictment is deemed to be a clerical error. On the other hand, Defendant B expressed the victim’s face at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) where the victim A (the “77 years of age” as stated in the indictment is an assault against the victim and took the victim’s her face to take the victim’s her face, such as an assault against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (in the case of the Defendant B, the date on which the second trial is made);

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each written diagnosis against the Defendants

1. Investigation report (related to listening to shots' telephone statements);

1. The application of relevant photographs, -B photographic Acts and subordinate statutes (of all the defendants);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that apply to the crime. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act that requires the choice of imprisonment, the degree of injury to the victim in the case of Defendant A, and the records of being sentenced to four times of fines due to a crime related to violence

1. The suspended execution recognizes the crimes of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and is against the law, and the defendants do not want the punishment against the other party as the victim by mutual consent.