2. The judgment of the court below reached several times, and the defendant committed a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties through some deceptive schemes during the period of repeated crime, and even though the court below agreed with some victims, it appears that all of these circumstances were considered in determining punishment. In full view of the following circumstances, there is no change of circumstances after the judgment of the court below, and other various circumstances, including the background, means and method of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age-oriented environment, etc., and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records and arguments of this case, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.