폭행치상
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. At around June 6, 2012, the Defendant, on the following day, expressed a wish to see the following: (a) around 21:30, the Defendant: (b) placed a banner at the back side of the “D” restaurant run by the Defendant, which lowers the air-conditioning value; and (c) placed a banner to sell it by reducing the air-conditioning value on the back of the restaurant run by the Defendant; and (d) expressed a mutually in dispute with the victim F (the age of 63) who operates the said restaurant to the same mail New-ro; and (e) expressed a desire to see
While the Defendant lying in one’s restaurant, the Defendant heard the above bath, and caused the victim’s booming of the booming of the boom, and caused the booming of the boom and the back head, etc. several times, and caused the victim’s booming of the booming of the breath, and caused the victim to go beyond the concrete floor, and the back head was faced with the victim’s breath.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as brain ties, ductal ductal ducts, ductal ductal ducts, and ductal ductal ductal ducts.
2. Determination:
A. The Defendant got back from the victim to the adultery, and recognized the fact that the victim went back to the rear at the time. However, the Defendant denied the charges of the injury caused by assault in the instant case, i.e., the victim’s e., e., e., e., g., breath.
B. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements made at the investigation agency of G, H and I to witness the scene at the time and testimony in this court.
At the time, the witness considered the fact that the defendant had the victim flow together with his breath.
C. However, at the time, there was a possibility that the above witness did not accurately see the situation, the J, which is another witness, and K testified in this court that "the defendant was only subject to an unilateral assault from the victim, and did not go beyond the victim, and the victim seems to have been suffering from what he was suffering," and the defendant made a net force.