However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On November 27, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Daegu District Court on November 27, 2009, and on February 7, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won or more for the same crime in the same court on February 7, 2013.

[2] On July 17, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.074% in blood at around 21:10, driving a B beer cruise cruise car at approximately 6 km in front of a new luminous church located in the same city north-gu dong, at the front of the Ggu Suwon-dong (road).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment to the previous summary order);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions of the instant records and arguments, including the following circumstances, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all of the sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and arguments.

The defendant was punished for a fine on two occasions due to drinking, but he/she was also driving under the influence of drinking.

The favorable circumstances: the defendant recognizes his mistake and reflects his mistake.

Defendant would not drive drinking again;

There are many things.