특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On September 15, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Seoul Northern District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on November 6, 2013 to a fine of KRW 2,500,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.
The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.
1. On May 10, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.107% from the 3km section of the blood alcohol level to the front road of treatment-type officetels in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong in order to ensure that the Defendant is unable to know the trade name on the 3km road.
As a result, the Defendant once or more times driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
2. On May 10, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused before the risk) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.107% among blood transfusions on May 10, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at a speed of about 51 to 60km in the direction of the 17-lane of the river line from the surface of the port of the river line to the 17-lane of the river line in the direction of the river line at the speed of 0.107%.
At the time, there was a cross-section in which signal apparatus was installed at night and at the front of the night, so there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to those engaged in driving service, to see the steering system, and to accurately manipulate the steering system and the brake system to prevent accidents in advance.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of the Defendant’s negligence and negligence in the course of duty that neglected to operate the brakes properly, and was under the influence of the victim C(55 years old) who was in the atmosphere of signal at the mastheading bank, and was under the influence of the Defendant’s vehicle, and was under the influence of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Hasta car.
Ultimately, the defendant is influenced by drinking.