1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won;

2. When the defendant does not pay the above fine;

(2) Defendant A [As indicated in the part of innocence at the top of 763 as follows: (a) Defendant A found Defendant A guilty only of the charge of forging and accompanying the part under J’s name among the agreement for the fixed equity agreement for the self-reshion of a reconstruction project on September 2014; (b) as such, the entry is within the scope recognized as identical]

1. On September 2014, the Defendant, at the reconstruction site office of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H and 1-Ground I (hereinafter “the instant loan”) and the re-building site office, the Defendant forged a contract for a fixed share of re-building project with the victim’s J on September 2014 (hereinafter “K”), which entered in the contract form “C” of the contracting party “A” as stated in the “C” of the contract form for a fixed share of re-building project with the victim J as the contracting party “A” (other than the representative and five other). (1) On September 2014, 2014, the Defendant arbitrarily sealed the victim’s J seal kept by the Defendant in his/her custody, thereby forging the victim’s name.

2. On July 24, 2015, the Defendant filed an application with the Seoul Western District Court for provisional seizure of real estate in accordance with Article 1201 of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Western District Court, accompanied by the evidence as if it was a document duly formed with the completion of the agreement on the fixed share ownership of the J’s reconstruction project on September 2014, 2014, and filed a claim for preservation or principal lawsuit against J on seven occasions from around that time to October 2, 2015, and filed a claim for preservation or principal lawsuit against J on seven occasions as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table of the crime committed. On September 2014, the Defendant used as evidence that the J part of the agreement on the fixed share ownership of the self reconstruction project was a document duly formed.

[200 [Attachment 200] The Defendant, who was awarded a contract for reconstruction work to Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I by the victim F (51 years old) on April 2014, was dissatisfied with the fact that the victim was living in the above I 501 without properly settling the construction cost.

On November 14, 2015, the Defendant employed a person, such as L, from around 14:0 to around 10, 2015, and directly has a 1st floor.