On August 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of conflict in the Changwon District Court Msan Branch on August 23, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Changwon Prison on June 30, 2013.

1. Around 18:50 on December 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) found the victim D’s house located in Gyeongnam-gun, Manam-gun, with the influence of alcohol, and continued to see the victim’s phrase “I am, I am,” even though I am “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am at the right hand of the victim

2. Damage to property;

A. The Defendant, at around 19:00 on the same day as Paragraph 1, 1, 19:00 on the day, she saw and unloaded any item of the items that he managed by the Victim F in E, without any reason, and damaged the current door door glass (which is equivalent to KRW 3.10,00,000 at the market price) and damaged its utility.

B. At around 08:00 on December 16, 2012, 2013 (the 2014th day of the indictment), the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, destroyed and damaged the village hall room room and the glass room and the shock screen (a total of KRW 400,00,000) managed by the victim F, and continuously damaged the Defendant’s right before the center, one (a total of KRW 400,00,000), one (b) the front day of the car of G white-type freight owned by the victim D, which was parked, from the front day of the center.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods at the top of the above 112-b, which was arrested of a flagrant offender at the front of the above 10-day community hall, in accordance with the circumstances where the police box affiliated with the H police station, which was called out after being reported 112, was sent to the police station, and was sent to the police box, which was sent to the patrol police station, at the rear seat of the said vehicle, and destroyed by a first flasium (110,000 won per market value) after the driver’s seat

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1..