The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, and did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of violating the Water-Related Leisure Activities Safety Act, or by omitting the necessary

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.