요양불승인처분취소
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim on this part is dismissed.
2...
1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff sought the revocation of the Defendant’s disposition that had not approved the “satisfe-satfe-satfe-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat-sat
As to this, the Plaintiff did not appeal, and only the Defendant appealed against the part of the above injury and disease, “the Esponsive Responsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsive Esponsives
2. The court's explanation concerning this part of the disposition of this case is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
3. Determination on the legitimacy of the instant disposition
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant’s disposition of this case, which judged otherwise, should be revoked on the ground that there was a proximate causal relation between the superior branch of this case and the disaster of this case, even if the causal relation is recognized as to the instant injury since the instant injury occurred due to the chronic damage of the superior branch caused by the instant disaster.
(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;
C. Medical opinions (hereinafter referred to as the “medical opinions”) Plaintiff 1’s main doctor (limited to those related to the instant main sentence) (the Plaintiff’s opinion that D Hospital’s external surgery and medical doctor E shall need drug and physical therapy, etc. as the Plaintiff’s severe pain and physical therapy due to falling short of his/her senstinism and the limitation on exercise continues, and in the absence of hostinism, it may be necessary to visit and seize the Plaintiff’s main doctor.
As a result of the RoI shooting against the plaintiff, the following observation was made on minor parts, such as post-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de