Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. At around 03:00 on May 19, 2013, the Defendant, as the father of the Defendant, who was a lineal ascendant of the victim D (74 years of age), was considered to have neglected the Defendant’s reputation, and the victim was injured by an open wound where the victim suffered damage to the victim’s face and shoulder, which caused damage to the victim’s saw that the victim, a lineal ascendant of the victim D (74 years of age), would be considered to have neglected the Defendant’s reputation. If the victim’s saw that the victim was able to drink well, the victim was able to take care of the victim’s satis, whether the victim was satisfy, and if the satisfy was not sated, the victim’s satch and satisf.

2. The Defendant, as the mother of the Defendant’s mother at the above date and at the above place, inflicted injury on the victim E (75) who is a lineal ascendant, on the ground that the Defendant was aware of the victim’s hysinginging of D as above, such as an unknown brain saliva for about 19 days in consideration of the victim’s face face due to drinking and growth.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. A report on internal investigation (17 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates and medical opinions;

1. Articles 262, 260 (2), and 257 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence since the victims, who are the parents of choice of punishment, attend the trial date, desire to keep the defendant's wife in mind;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;