When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 00:03 on October 11, 2013, the Defendant visited D taxi driver E (Nam, 60 years of age) at a police box located in B at Jeju-si, and requested the Defendant not to pay KRW 7,000 for taxi expenses. As such, C police box assistantF required the Defendant to calculate taxi expenses for approximately 2-3 minutes, but did not account, and asked the personal information, but did not answer.

In addition, at around 00:10 on the same day, the Defendant did not pay a taxi fee and attempted to flee, and the Defendant committed assault, such as “I see whether I am in the mind, I see I am in the mind, I am in the mind,” and ring the qui of the victim slopeF, I am in the hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate performance of official duties concerning situation work and civil petition handling work of assistant F, who is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.