When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On January 5, 2010, the Defendant: (a) opened chips at B hotel casino room in Makao, banking, and other places at the Defendant’s desire; (b) opened chips on the floor; (c) opened chips at the place at which the Defendant wants; and (d) opened chips at first received chip cards or opened chip cards on the floor in accordance with the prescribed rules; and (d) opened chip cards on the side near 9, or opened chip in the nearest 9 in total; or (e) opened chip in a way that the sum of the last chip numbers is equal to the sum of chip and the banking number, from around that time to April 5, 2011.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stuffed the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of account transactions in the name of a suspect, a statement of account transactions in the name of a suspect bank, a statement of account transactions in the name of a suspect, and a certificate of electronic financial transfer;

1. Application of the statutes on copies of passports;

1. Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 246 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that there is no record of the same criminal punishment for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the fact that the crime is recognized and reflected, the frequency and amount of gambling, the circumstances of the crime, etc.