However, with respect to Defendant A, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

B On May 12, 2011, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced one year to a violation of the Sound Records, Video Products and Game Software Act, etc., and was released on March 30, 2012 and the parole period expired on May 11, 2012.

On November 2012, the Defendants stated to the effect that “The Defendants may secure approximately KRW 30 through 40,000,000 per day, and a approximately KRW 40,50,000,000,000,000 in the Internet gambling game business, such as a high-profit sacker and a high stop-to-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-sto-s to-sto-s to-sto-s to-s to-s to-sto-s to-s to-s to-s to-s to

However, in fact, the Defendants were trying to run the Internet gambling game business only on the basis of the money invested by the victims because they had particular property at the time or did not have any import. At the beginning, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to invest KRW 120 million. The Defendants did not complete the development of the Internet gambling game program at a certain level to secure a large number of users at the time, and there was no ability to guarantee profits as if they were promised to commit to the victims.

The Defendants received a total of KRW 130 million from the victim to the single bank account in each G, including the amount of KRW 30 million from the victim on November 19, 2012, KRW 50 million on November 27, 2012, KRW 20 million on December 19, 2012, KRW 30 million on January 4, 2013, and KRW 130 million on January 19, 2013. From November 19, 2012 to August 9, 2013, the Defendants deceiving the victim on five occasions, and received KRW 239 million on a total from the victim.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to obtain a total of KRW 239 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendant A