When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The head of a Si/Gun/Gu, the Mayor/Do Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall take measures, such as hospitalized or isolation a person who suffers from an infectious disease at an appropriate place for a fixed period, in order to prevent the spread of the infectious disease upon the outbreak of the infectious disease, and no person shall violate any measure

Nevertheless, the Defendant was classified as “a person who is infected or likely to be infected with, or spread of, an infectious disease,” which is a Class 1 infectious disease, by having contact with the patient with the patient with the communicable disease “Saro -19.” On September 6, 2020, the Defendant violated measures for isolation by visiting E in Bupyeong-si, Seoul, and the Defendant’s residence, even though he was notified that the person should be isolated from the public official in charge of the Busan-si Public Health Center around September 6, 2020 through September 7, 2020. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22190, Sep. 10, 2020>

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statement of F in the accusation market of the police interrogation protocol for the defendant's statutory statement - Apology investigation document of the suspect interrogation room for the defendant - report on the situation - CCTV closure - screen - isolation notice after convenience points - banner photographs - the advice of the person subject to isolation - Each investigation report (in addition to relevant data, such as postponement of investigation of the suspect A, isolation of the person, etc., immediately after the inspection) on his/her daily life rules for the person subject to isolation;

1. Article 79-3 subparag. 5 of the Act on the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases (Violation of Quarantine Measures), Article 47 subparag. 3 of the Act on the Prevention and Control of Specific Communicable Diseases (the crime of this case is committed by the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was notified of isolation on the ground that the Defendant was informed of isolation, and visited tobacco at the convenience store in the course of returning home after undergoing the inspection of nose or virus infection infection on the following day, and is in violation of isolation measures. The purpose of isolation measures is to purchase tobacco, in particular, for minor reasons such as the process of the crime, motive, consequence, and consequence of the crime, as well as for taking quarantine measures on September 8, 2020.