2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff, etc. is a police officer of the senior position who served as the captain of B police station C police station from February 5, 2013, and the assistant assistant D, E, and Senior F are police officers who served in the said police box.

B. On December 31, 2013, at around 00:38, a criminal suspect escape case occurred and the criminal suspect escaped by causing the suspect to have his/her escape, who complained of his/her custody cards scambling in the process of investigating the stolen suspect for whom slope D was arrested at the above police box.

C. With respect to the above case, on January 28, 2014, the Defendant took disciplinary action against D, E, and F: (a) as the manager of the patrol team, D, as an acting manager of D, D, who did not designate a manager in charge of surveillance after arresting a stolen suspect; (b) did not check the left-hand lock of the suspect's right-hand locker; (c) left the patrol vehicle by personal request; and (d) did not take measures for the escape of E, who was under surveillance duty without using the entrance or wireless renovation of the suspect's escape; and (e) did not arrest the suspect if the suspect went to go to a different method by moving to the retaining wall with three meters away from the wall; and (vi) requested the manager in charge of surveillance, without immediately supporting experience or emergency investigation duties, and requested the guard of the suspect to conduct the instant search and inspection; and (v) the Defendant took disciplinary action against the suspect as the disciplinary action against E, 1, 2012.

The police box was withdrawn upon the personal request of the staff of the police station to facilitate the escape of the suspect, and ② to use the official vehicle(s) for about seven minutes for private use, ③ to take a disciplinary measure for the period of three months of the reduction of salary, on the ground that the police box was not taken for the purpose of preventing the escape of the suspect, such as not using the wireless opening of the entrance.

3. The defendant shall make January 3, 2014.