When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall use a precise device for an election campaign, except where it is used for a speech, interview or debate at the place of a campaign speech or interview at an open place or at the place of an interview or debate under the Election of Public Officials Act.

Nevertheless, on June 12, 2018, the Defendant shall not be elected to E in front of the C church located in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, as a candidate for the 7th simultaneous local election D with a small loudspeaker on June 12, 2018.

This is because the same-sex talks about the legalization of the same sex, and the same-sexs can not be raised as they are suffering from the same-sexs.

Methically, Latherba Lather.

The words that the people use are after the dint of why they use.

E does not know why it should be legalized.

Whether the people are treated as dogs or pigss;

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried out an election campaign using a positive device.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the 112 Report Processing List, on-site photographs, and internal investigation reports (in-house sites, reporting persons, etc.);

1. Article 255 of the Act on the Election of Public Officials and Articles 255 (2) 4 and 91 (1) of the Act on the Election of Public Officials concerning Criminal Facts, and Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Penalty surcharges of 50,000 to 6 million won by law;

2. No sentencing criteria are set for recommendations according to the sentencing criteria.

3. The crime of this case, which is a fine of KRW 300,000,00, is not enough in that the defendant, who is a candidate for the 7-time local election, has carried out an election campaign with his complaint against E, to criticize and criticize E using a loudspeaker, thereby impairing the fairness of the election and the efficiency of election management.

However, there is a lack of understanding of the relevant laws and regulations that the defendant can recognize and reflect the crime of this case.