2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant reflects the crime, and that the victim has recovered from damage and has reached a full agreement.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, and that the accident in this case occurred without being aware of the period of suspension of the execution due to driving without a license for driving alcohol and without a license, and that the nature of the crime is not very good in that the defendant escaped without taking relief measures, and that the sentence against the defendant is determined by the court below, considering the above various circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that may vary from the court below's age and punishment, and other circumstances that form the conditions of the argument in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's argument cannot be accepted because the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.