2. Some of the circumstances are to be taken into account when the occurrence of each of the instant crimes, such as the victim L, first, was involved in the trial cost.

However, the defendant jointly injured the victim's face at least twice a month, and the victim's face already used was broken and the bones was broken off, and the victim G also suffered bodily injury, and the crime is not very good in light of the method of assault, the degree of injury of the victims, and the degree of injury.

Nevertheless, in full view of the fact that there was no agreement with the victims and there was no measure to recover damage, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, and means and method of the crime, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected on the ground that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable to the extent that it should be reversed.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.