If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around June 22, 2011, the Defendant forged, without authority, one copy of the mobile phone entry application under the name of D, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations by stating “D”, “E”, “E”, and “D” in the customer address column in the name of the subscriber to the site for the application for new entry of LGU in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yongsan-gu, and making the buyer enter “D or D” in the lower end.

2. The Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article: (a) delivered an application for new entry of a forged DNA mobile phone to an employee under his/her name, who is unaware of the circumstances, as if the document was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Relevant Articles 231 (Forgery of Private Document) and 234 and 231 (Uttering of Private Document) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (the punishment is against each other, and considering that the victim is his father, etc.);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.