If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Defendant

A is a state-free, victim C is a state-run, and victim E is a state-run, "F" state-run.

1. On March 26, 2017, from around 18:5 to June 22, 2017, the victim C thief: (a) the Defendant stolen the victim’s land by means of putting in a bag prepared in advance by extracting an amount equivalent to KRW 2,000 in eight (8) of “multi-land” for sales in the victim’s dwelling for the purpose of growing the victim’s dwelling in his/her dwelling by taking advantage of the gapss displayed in front of the shop for the “D” 103-dong commercial building, 103, which were displayed in front of the shop, for a total of four occasions.

2. On June 15, 2017, the victim Eththth thief was stolen by putting the amount equivalent to 5 km of 5 km and 5,000 won, which was prepared in advance at the victim’s shop, in a plastic paper, for the purpose of using the gaps in surveillance neglected around the center of “F” in the “F,” which was located in Hasking-si H, for the purpose of using the gaps in which surveillance was neglected, in his/her dwelling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The reason for an agreement with the victims is reached, the damages are minor and partial returned, and there are no criminal records of the same kind.