However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates an entertainment tavern with the trade name “C” on the Daegu-gu B and the first basement.

No person shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

From August 20, 2019 to October 17, 2019 of the same year, the Defendant employed 15 foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea, such as the entry in the list of crimes in the attached Table, including employing as an entertainment reception reception worker the D of the nationality of Thailand holding the status of stay eligible for visa exemption (B-1) that is not the status of employment, which is not the status of sojourn eligible for employment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written statements of employees and written confirmations on employment of foreigners;

1. Relevant Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 18 (3) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that an error is repented, etc.);