However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 5, 2011, the Defendant: (a) asked the pro-Japanese D to deliver joint and several sureties to obtain a loan from only distribution of YY Co., Ltd.; and (b) requested D to give a joint and several sureties a copy of resident registration, a certificate of seal imprint, a seal imprint, etc.; (c) the victim had withdrawn his/her intent to guarantee on the following day; (d) forged a promissory note, a power of attorney, etc. in the name of D; and (e) used a portion of the loan.

1. The Defendant: (a) despite the withdrawal of his/her intent to guarantee, the Defendant: (b) stated D’s withdrawal of the intention to use part of the loan to D; (c) stated D’s resident registration certificate, seal imprint, seal imprint, etc. to the effect that D would allow D’s guarantee; and (d) stated D’s approval on April 15, 201 by not delivering D’s intent to withdraw guarantee; (b) stated D’s approval on the face value in the office of Law Firm E, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul; (c) stated D’s issuance date as “TB million won; (d)” on April 15, 2011; and (d) indicated D’s seal on the date and time as indicated in paragraph (1) in the name of D’s name. Accordingly, the Defendant forged a promissory note, which is a securities in the name of D for the purpose of exercising the right to use.

“The purpose of “” is to describe “G, Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Apartment 106-804” in the proxy column using the tampial in the proxy form printed, stating “G, Gangseo-gu H apartment unit 106-804” in the face value column, “Tcheon 1,000,” “The issue date column” in the issuer column, “(C) 1,000,000 in the payee column,” and “D and Seocho-gu Igra 304,” and to affix D seal on D’s name.

The defendant is therefore entitled to exercise.