beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.11.01 2013고단349

폭행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Injury;

A. On February 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00, on the ground that the victim was drinking and drinking alcohol without controlling the customer and drinking alcohol; (b) caused injury to the victim, such as the face, side and mouth of the victim due to drinking and drinking, and the next victim’s injury on the left-hand left-hand side in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

B. On March 7, 2012, around 06:20 on March 7, 2012, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim’s head at the head where the number of days of treatment can not be known due to the fact that the Defendant’s cell phones was not explained the reason why the Defendant’s cell phone setting was not known before the Jung-gu Incheon International Airport 3rd International Airport was set up.

C. At around 14:00 on March 18, 2012, the Defendant suffered injury, such as damage to the chrons in which the number of treatment days cannot be known by sending the Defendant’s bicycle to his mother, on the ground that the victim sent the Defendant’s bicycle to his mother without any explanation, and assembled without a sex, and the victim’s bucks.

At around 11:00 on April 21, 2012, the Defendant sent a bicycle to the “bicycle event” under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, and brought an injury on the face where the victim’s face, face, and face cannot be known by walking the arms and face from a hand, on the ground that the victim sent the bicycle to the “bicycle event” under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, and did not ask the Defendant of accurate location.

E. The Defendant, around 15:00 on June 10, 2012, operated the above “D” on the 15:00 room of Gyeonggi-do, on the ground that the victim would not easily conduct the way-to-face search with the mobile phone, the Defendant’s “whether it would not be possible for the Defendant to change the cell phone in the fora,” and the “business plan.”